Impacto de la fragilidad en la supervivencia intrahospitalaria en pacientes mayores con infección por COVID-19: la importancia de su identificación temprana. Registro Nacional SEMI-COVID / The impact of frailty on intra-hospital survival in older patients with COVID-19 infection: The importance of early identification. SEMI-COVID National Registry

Introducción La evidencia reciente sugiere que la fragilidad puede ser un importante predictor de resultados adversos en personas mayores hospitalizadas por COVID-19. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar el valor pronóstico de la fragilidad en la supervivencia intrahospitalaria de estos pacientes. Métodos Estudio observacional, multicéntrico y de ámbito nacional de pacientes ≥70 años hospitalizados a consecuencia de la COVID-19 en España desde el 1 de marzo hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2020. Los datos de los pacientes se obtuvieron del Registro SEMI-COVID-19 de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna. Se utilizó la escala de fragilidad Clínica (CFS, por sus siglas en inglés) para evaluar la fragilidad. El resultado primario fue la supervivencia hospitalaria. Se realizó un modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox para evaluar los predictores de supervivencia. Resultados Se incluyeron 1.878 participantes (52% varones y 48% mujeres). Mil trescientos cincuenta y un supervivientes (71,9%) y 527 no supervivientes (28,1%). El grupo de no supervivientes presentaba en comparación con los supervivientes una media de edad superior (83,5 frente a 81 años), más comorbilidades (6,3 frente a 5,3 puntos en el índice de Charlson), mayor grado de dependencia (26,8 frente al 12,4% de pacientes con dependencia severa) y de fragilidad (34,5 frente al 14,7% de pacientes con fragilidad severa), sin embargo, no hubo diferencias en cuanto al sexo. Nuestros resultados muestran que un grado de fragilidad moderado-grave es el principal factor asociado de forma independiente con una menor supervivencia (HR: 2,344; 1,437-3,823; p<0,001 para SFC 5-6 y HR: 3,694; 2,155-6,330; p<0,001 para SFC 7-9. Conclusiones La fragilidad es el principal predictor de resultados adversos en pacientes mayores con COVID-19. El uso de herramientas como la CFS es fundamental para la detección precoz de fragilidad en esta población (AU)

Background Emerging evidence suggests that frailty may be a significant predictor of poor outcomes in older individuals hospitalized due to COVID-19. This study aims to determine the prognostic value of frailty on intrahospital patient survival. Methods This observational, multicenter, nationwide study included patients aged 70 years and older who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain between March 1 and December 31, 2020. Patient data were obtained from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. The primary outcome was hospital survival. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess predictors of survival. Results A total of 1878 participants (52% men and 48% women) were included, with 1351 (71.9%) survivors and 527 (28.1%) non-survivors. The non-survivor group had higher mean age (83.5 vs. 81 years), comorbidities (6.3 vs. 5.3 points on the Charlson index), degree of dependency (26.8% vs. 12.4% severely dependent patients), and frailty (34.5% vs. 14.7% severely frail patients) compared to survivors. However, there were no differences in terms of sex. Our results demonstrate that a moderate–severe degree of frailty is the primary factor independently associated with shorter survival (HR 2.344; 1.437-3.823; p < 0.001 for CFS 5-6 and 3.694; 2.155–6.330; p < 0.001 for CFS 7-9). Conclusion Frailty is the main predictor of adverse outcomes in older patients with COVID-19. The utilization of tools such as the Clinical Frailty Scale is crucial for early detection in this population (AU)

Características de los pacientes hospitalizados con hipercalcemia en la provincia de Málaga: estudio longitudinal, retrospectivo y multicéntrico / Characteristics of hospitalized patients with hypercalcemia in the province of Malaga: A longitudinal, retrospective, multicenter study

Antecedentes y objetivo Existen escasos estudios que analicen la hipercalcemia en pacientes hospitalizados. Nuestros objetivos fueron: describir las características clínicas de los pacientes hospitalizados con hipercalcemia, estimar su prevalencia en el medio hospitalario, analizar la tasa de corrección de la hipercalcemia, e identificar variables pronósticas. Materiales y métodos Estudio observacional, longitudinal, retrospectivo y bicéntrico. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos ingresados en dos hospitales de Málaga (2014-2018) con diagnóstico de hipercalcemia. El seguimiento mínimo fue de 2años o hasta el fallecimiento. Resultados Se incluyeron 205 pacientes con hipercalcemia (incidencia: 0,13%). La edad media (DE) fue de 68,2 (13,1) años, con predominio de varones (55,1%). La calcemia mediana (RIC) al ingreso fue de 13,1 (11,8-14,6) mg/dL. Las etiologías más frecuentes fueron: neoplasias (75,1%), hiperparatiroidismo primario y fármacos (ambas, 8,8%). La mediana (RIC) de seguimiento fue de 5,1 (1,7-60,3) semanas. Los tratamientos más usados fueron: fluidoterapia (86,8%), diuréticos de asa (70,9%), bifosfonatos (60,7%) y glucocorticoides (46,2%). La tasa de corrección de la hipercalcemia fue del 65,2%, con una mediana (RIC) de 6 (3-10) días La tasa de mortalidad fue del 81,5%. La mediana (IC95%) de supervivencia fue de 5,1 (3-7,3) semanas. Los factores asociados a una mayor mortalidad fueron: edad avanzada, etiología neoplásica, calcemia al ingreso y no corrección de la hipercalcemia. Conclusiones La hipercalcemia en pacientes hospitalizados se debe principalmente a procesos neoplásicos y se asocia a una elevada mortalidad. Observamos una baja tasa de seguimiento de las recomendaciones para el manejo de la hipercalcemia (AU)

Background and objective There are limited studies analyzing hypercalcemia in hospitalized patients. Our objectives were to describe the clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with hypercalcemia, estimate its prevalence in the hospital setting, analyze the rate of correction of hypercalcemia, and identify prognostic variables. Materials and methods Observational, longitudinal, retrospective, and bicentric study. Adult patients admitted to two hospitals in Málaga (2014-2018) with a diagnosis of hypercalcemia were included. The minimum follow-up was 2years or until death. Results A total of 205 patients with hypercalcemia were included (incidence: 0.13%). The mean age (SD) was 68.2 (13.1) years, with a predominance of males (55.1%). The median (IQR) serum calcium at admission was 13.1 (11.8-14.6) mg/dL. The most common etiologies were neoplasms (75.1%), primary hyperparathyroidism, and medications (both 8.8%). The median (IQR) follow-up period was 5.1 (1.7-60.3) weeks. The most commonly used treatments were fluid therapy (86.8%), loop diuretics (70.9%), bisphosphonates (60.7%), and glucocorticoids (46.2%). The rate of correction of hypercalcemia was 65.2%, with a median (IQR) of 6 (3-10) days. The mortality rate was 81.5%. The median (95%CI) survival was 5.1 (3-7.3) weeks. Factors associated with higher mortality were advanced age, neoplastic etiology, serum calcium at admission, and failure to correct hypercalcemia. Conclusions Hypercalcemia in hospitalized patients is mainly due to neoplastic processes and is associated with high mortality. We observed a low rate of adherence to recommendations for the management of hypercalcemia (AU)

Characteristics of hospitalized patients with hypercalcemia in the province of Malaga: a longitudinal, retrospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There are limited studies analyzing hypercalcemia in hospitalized patients. Our objectives were to describe the clinical characteristics of hospitalized patients with hypercalcemia, estimate its prevalence in the hospital setting, analyze the rate of correction of hypercalcemia, and identify prognostic variables. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observational, longitudinal, retrospective, and bicentric study. Adult patients admitted to two hospitals in Málaga (2014-2018) with a diagnosis of hypercalcemia were included. The minimum follow-up was 2 years or until death. RESULTS: A total of 205 patients with hypercalcemia were included (incidence: 0.13%). The mean age (SD) was 68.2 (13.1) years, with a predominance of males (55.1%). The median (IQR) serum calcium at admission was 13.1 (11.8-14.6) mg/dl. The most common etiologies were neoplasms (75.1%), primary hyperparathyroidism, and medications (both 8.8%). The median (IQR) follow-up period was 5.1 (1.7-60.3) weeks. The most commonly used treatments were fluid therapy (86.8%), loop diuretics (70.9%), bisphosphonates (60.7%), and glucocorticoids (46.2%). The rate of correction of hypercalcemia was 65.2%, with a median (IQR) of 6 (3-10) days. The mortality rate was 81.5%. The median (95% CI) survival was 5.1 (3-7.3) weeks. Factors associated with higher mortality were advanced age, neoplastic etiology, serum calcium at admission, and failure to correct hypercalcemia. CONCLUSIONS: Hypercalcemia in hospitalized patients is mainly due to neoplastic processes and is associated with high mortality. We observed a low rate of adherence to recommendations for the management of hypercalcemia.

The impact of frailty on intra-hospital survival in older patients with COVID-19 infection: the importance of early identification. SEMI-COVID National Registry.

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that frailty may be a significant predictor of poor outcomes in older individuals hospitalized due to COVID-19. This study aims to determine the prognostic value of frailty on intrahospital patient survival. METHODS: This observational, multicenter, nationwide study included patients aged 70 years and older who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain between March 1 and December 31, 2020. Patient data were obtained from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale. The primary outcome was hospital survival. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess predictors of survival. RESULTS: A total of 1,878 participants (52% men and 48% women) were included, with 1,351 (71.9%) survivors and 527 (28.1%) non-survivors. The non-survivor group had higher mean age (83.5 vs. 81 years), comorbidities (6.3 vs. 5.3 points on the Charlson index), degree of dependency (26.8% vs. 12.4% severely dependent patients), and frailty (34.5% vs. 14.7% severely frail patients) compared to survivors. However, there were no differences in terms of sex. Our results demonstrate that a moderate-severe degree of frailty is the primary factor independently associated with shorter survival [HR 2.344 (1.437-3.823; p<0.001) for CFS 5-6 and 3.694 (2.155-6.330; p<0.001) for CFS 7-9]. CONCLUSION: Frailty is the main predictor of adverse outcomes in older patients with COVID-19. The utilization of tools such as the Clinical Frailty Scale is crucial for early detection in this population.

Síndrome de COVID-19 persistente. Una revisión narrativa / Persistent COVID-19 syndrome. A narrative review

A medida que ha avanzado la pandemia de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), originada por la infección por el coronavirus de tipo 2, causante del síndrome respiratorio agudo severo (SARS-CoV-2), el síndrome de COVID-19 persistente es un problema cada vez más reconocido y sobre el que se está desarrollando un importante volumen de publicaciones. Los síntomas pueden ser persistentes o aparecer, tras un periodo asintomático, semanas o meses después de la infección inicial. El cuadro clínico es tan marcadamente heterogéneo y multisistémico como en la fase aguda, por lo que se requiere un manejo multidisciplinar. Además, su aparición no está relacionada con la gravedad de la infección inicial, por lo que pueden afectar tanto a pacientes leves, incluso asintomáticos, como a enfermos graves que han requerido hospitalización. Aunque puede afectar a personas de cualquier edad, es más frecuente en mujeres de edad media. Las secuelas pueden generar un elevado impacto en la calidad de vida y en el ámbito laboral y social. El objetivo de este trabajo es hacer una revisión sobre el síndrome de COVID-19 persistente, conocer sus manifestaciones clínicas y las estrategias para el manejo y el seguimiento de estos pacientes (AU)

As the coronavirus-2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) coronavirus type 2, has progressed, persistent COVID-19 syndrome is an increasingly recognized problem on which a significant volume of medical literature is developing. Symptoms may be persistent or appear, after an asymptomatic period, weeks or months after the initial infection. The clinical picture is as markedly heterogeneous and multisystemic as in the acute phase, so multidisciplinary management is required. In addition, their appearance is not related to the severity of the initial infection, so they can affect both mild patients, even asymptomatic, and seriously ill patients who have required hospitalization. Although it can affect people of any age, it is more common in middle-aged women. The sequelae can generate a high impact on the quality of life, and in the work and social environment. The objective of this paper is to review persistent COVID-19 syndrome, to know its clinical manifestations and the strategies for the management and follow-up of these patients (AU)

Persistent COVID-19 syndrome. A narrative review.

As the coronavirus-2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) coronavirus type 2, has progressed, persistent COVID-19 syndrome is an increasingly recognized problem on which a significant volume of medical literature is developing. Symptoms may be persistent or appear, after an asymptomatic period, weeks or months after the initial infection. The clinical picture is as markedly heterogeneous and multisystemic as in the acute phase, so multidisciplinary management is required. In addition, their appearance is not related to the severity of the initial infection, so they can affect both mild patients, even asymptomatic, and seriously ill patients who have required hospitalization. Although it can affect people of any age, it is more common in middle-aged women. The sequelae can generate a high impact on the quality of life, and in the work and social environment. The objective of this paper is to review persistent COVID-19 syndrome, to know its clinical manifestations and the strategies for the management and follow-up of these patients.

[Persistent COVID-19 syndrome. A narrative review]. / Síndrome de COVID-19 persistente. Una revisión narrativa.

As the coronavirus-2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) coronavirus type 2, has progressed, persistent COVID-19 syndrome is an increasingly recognized problem on which a significant volume of medical literature is developing. Symptoms may be persistent or appear, after an asymptomatic period, weeks or months after the initial infection. The clinical picture is as markedly heterogeneous and multisystemic as in the acute phase, so multidisciplinary management is required. In addition, their appearance is not related to the severity of the initial infection, so they can affect both mild patients, even asymptomatic, and seriously ill patients who have required hospitalization. Although it can affect people of any age, it is more common in middle-aged women. The sequelae can generate a high impact on the quality of life, and in the work and social environment. The objective of this paper is to review persistent COVID-19 syndrome, to know its clinical manifestations and the strategies for the management and follow-up of these patients.